Booting of JAL President Sign of the Times
(Bloomberg) Japan Airlines Corp. ousted President Toshiyuki Shinmachi, ending a boardroom feud that was started by a major shareholder. Shinmachi had been in his post only since April, and will be replaced by the finance director, Haruka Nishimatsu, while the Board of Directors will expand to accomodate 12 new directors, and 5 current directors will leave.
Shinmachi's replacement must win union support to cut wages by 10 percent while regaining customers lost to rival All Nippon Airways Co. JAL's shares were up on the news, indicating that investors welcomed the change.
In typical fashion, Shinmachi will be "kicked upstairs to Chairman". But unless JAL restructures thoroughly under new management, the future is uncertain. JAL is among global carriers that have been hurt by surging fuel prices in an industry that may report a combined 2006 loss of $4 billion, according to the International Air Transport Association. The company's third-quarter loss widened to JPY11.1 billion as its fuel bill rose 28%.
JAL was established by a bunch of bankers in 1951, and merged with the country's 3rd-largest Japan Air Systems in 2002. It is the flag carrier for "Japan Inc.", but what do a bunch of bankers know?
What is clear from the experience is that Japan is beginning to recognize and react to the fact that consensus choices for management are not always the best choices. In JAL's case, the movement against Shinmachi began with a major shareholder, but then spread to other senior managers within the group. In baseball terms, its as if one of the team's owners expressed displeasure with the head coach, and the opinion was backed by other coaches that supposedly were there to support the head coach, and even the players. Yet corporate governance by shareholders, senior managers and employees within the company is still rare in Japan, it has been a fact of life for baseball teams in Japan for years. In other words, if a head coach were unable to produce a championship team within a couple of years, he was replaced by another coach.
TJI believes this will increasingly occur in Japan's corporate world, i.e., if a CEO is unable to deliver the goods in the terms of major shareholders and other stakeholders, he has a real risk of being replaced. While detractors claim that this will lead to more short-term management strategies, TJI suspects it will produce an increasing number of managers with a "hot hand" that can produce a few years of good results, only to be eventually overtaken by other, more dynamic competitors. This is a classic symptom of a mature market. In other words, as the "pie" is no longer growing, Japanese companies increasingly have to be able and willing to take share from their competitors to produce growth.
